Introducing Psychology in the Wild
What began with The Lizard Effect has inspired us to continue exploring how the natural world can provide vivid metaphors for human psychology.
Animal behaviours and survival strategies can help make complex emotional experiences easier to recognise and understand. Through this developing series, we will use familiar creatures and their adaptations as starting points for thinking about how people protect themselves, relate to others and respond to their environments.
Next in the series: The Mosquito Effect
Kerstin and Egle are still in Sardinia. In the evenings, we have found ourselves fighting an almost invisible force: tiny, extraordinarily fast mosquitoes.
We rarely see them arrive. They bite before we can notice or protect ourselves, and we become aware of them only through what they leave behind—the sudden, spreading itch caused by their saliva. Their presence is registered through its effect on the body.
This brought to mind another kind of experience: the way another person’s emotional hunger can sometimes enter and begin to occupy our psychological space.
We may not immediately recognise what is happening. Instead, we notice the after-effects: tension, guilt, urgency, irritation, exhaustion, or a growing sense that we must reassure, respond, soothe or provide. Gradually, another person’s needs and demands may begin to colonise our attention. Their hunger starts to feel like our responsibility.
We are calling this the Mosquito Effect. It is not an established psychological or diagnostic term, but a metaphor for a familiar relational experience.
Psychoanalytic thinking has used the term object hunger to describe an intense longing for emotional nourishment, recognition and connection, often following early relational deprivation. Attachment hunger may be a more accessible way of describing it.
When we have been emotionally thirsty for a long time, our attention can narrow around what we need from another person. When our need for closeness or reassurance becomes intense, it can become harder to think clearly about both our own feelings and the other person’s experience.
The other person can then become experienced primarily as a source of reassurance, attention or emotional regulation, rather than as a whole person with needs, limits and an inner world of their own.
Like the mosquito, we may not approach with conscious cruelty or the wish to cause harm. We may simply be trying to survive an old deprivation. But understanding the origin of the hunger does not remove its impact. The other person may still feel consumed, invaded or unseen.
Most of us will recognise something of both positions: the experience of being emotionally hungry and the experience of someone else’s hunger getting under our skin.
Healing does not mean learning not to need other people. It means becoming able to recognise and communicate our thirst; to ask rather than take; to tolerate waiting, limits or disappointment; and to remember that the person who nourishes us is another whole person—not simply our source of food.
← Back to all reflections